Saturday, May 4, 2024

Donkeys on the St Kilda Beach

In January 1905, The Australasian, published a delightful account of a family spending the day at the St Kilda beach, which included the following - 
About 2 o'clock the donkeys come down. They are such dear, little, obstinate creatures, and are about eleven in number; but more are to come from New Zealand, where they are bred. The children are delighted with the novelty. They pet and fondle them, and discover their names engraved on their halters. There is Gipsy, Topsy, Madcap, Murmur, Bland Holt, Seddon, and Napoleon. This last donkey objects to carrying adults or boys, he likes the girls best. It is strange how he knows, instantly a man or boy is wont to get on his back he bucks most viciously, and yet for the girls his temper is angelic. Double-seated wicker saddles are provided for the very little children, and the donkeys look so pretty with a double-freight of chubby babies; on their backs. I am sure they feel their twofold responsibility in carrying such precious burdens. Boys and girls ride straddle-saddle, so there is little fear of a fall. Even if such a catastrophe should happen, it would not be serious on the sand. Boys accompany the riders, whipping the donkeys up, until they break into a fast trot, and judging by the beaming faces of the children, it must be great fun, and well worth a trial. Several timid little girls want a ride badly, but they are afraid unless an elder sister walks beside the donkey to held then on. Then the difficulty is to get them off, as they have enjoyed the ride so much. (1)


Are these Gipsy, Topsy, Madcap, Murmur, Bland Holt, Seddon, and Napoleon?
Donkeys on the St Kilda Beach, dated c. 1906. State Library of Victoria image H33670/4   http://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/289402

The donkeys belonged to Mr H. Wright, who had applied to the St Kilda Council in March 1904 for  permission to run donkeys on the beach foreshore for the amusement of children. Below high water mark the council has no jurisdiction, but, subject to supervision, it was decided to offer no opposition, and the application was referred to the public works committee to consider the terms. (2)

The Public Works Committee granted Mr Wright, permissive occupancy of the foreshore, between the baths and Brooke's boat house, for donkey rides, subject to regulations to be drawn up. (3)

In spite of this permission (and possibly because a new application was required each year) Mr Wright applied again to the Council in November 1904 to use a portion of the foreshore for the purpose of giving rides on donkeys to all and sundry. (4) He was granted permission for donkeys being run on the foreshore north of Kenney's baths to a point in line with Mary-street. (5)


Donkeys on the St Kilda Beach

Gipsy, Topsy, Madcap, Murmur, Bland Holt, Seddon, and Napoleon were very popular with the children, but there was drama in early January of 1905 when the donkeys were attacked. The following letter was written to the Editor of The Argus newspaper -
Sir -This is what happened at half past 4 on Tuesday afternoon on St Kilda beach. A respectable young man is running donkeys, and while some were carrying their human freights two larrikins took from a cart - which they had driven to the water's edge - one or two fierce bulldogs. The collar was removed and the bulldog let go. It deliberately set on to a donkey carrying a little boy. The boy was severely bitten about the legs necessitating hospital dressing, and the donkey was greatly injured, needing the services of a veterinary surgeon. Police assistance was sought in every direction and although the depot was telephoned no police arrived for fully 40 minutes. (6)


Donkeys on the Sands, St Kilda.
Image not dated but likely to be c. 1905
 Australian National Maritime Museum image 00001937 


I have no information as to whether the donkeys were on the beach all year, or just over the Summer season, but as this article from the newspaper in November 1905, tells us 
Numbers of children were disappointed on Monday at St Kilda owing to the absence of the donkeys on the beach. It was not discernible whether it was because the public works department sand trucks are shifting the whole beach between Brook's boathouse and the baths or whether it was owing to some other reason. Anyhow the donkeys were not there and the sand tracks were, whilst it may be added that the beach is gradually disappearing. Will it ever - like the cat - come back again? (7)


On the Sands at St Kilda - lounging adults and children riding donkeys.


Did the Donkeys come back that Summer? I cannot say. I have found other accounts of the donkeys at the the St Kilda Beach, the earliest one from November 1868. In January 1870, The Age advertised that Rowland's stud of Donkeys will be at St Kilda Beach during the week, and at Brighton on Sundays, during the season. (8)  But these donkeys were not popular with everyone as The Herald noted in February 1870- 
Donkey Riding at St. Kilda - A correspondent writes to us anent the "donkey riding nuisance," and says "it ought to be done away with by the authorities." Alluding to yesterday afternoon, our correspondent says : "At one time there were two or three hundred boys on the St. Kilda beach, where a man hired out several donkeys for short rides along the beach. Every time a donkey started a number of these boys would scamper after them, yelling, and shouting, and cheering, to the great annoyance of those who were out for a gentle stroll by the rippling waters of the bay to enjoy the fresh breeze after the confinement of the week." We quite agree with the writer of the above, that what he complains of is a great nuisance, and should be checked. (9)

In January 1871, Mr Rowland  put his stock of donkeys, mules and equipment up for auction which offered a man of small capital the opportunity to enter into a lucrative pursuit. (10)


Mr Rowlands sells his donkeys


After 1871, I could find no reports of donkey rides until Mr H. Wright and his donkeys in 1904 and 1905. 

The next confirmed reports of donkey rides was in December 1923, when the newspapers could announce that one of the traditional delights of English seaside resorts donkey rules for children will be an attraction at St. Kilda this summer. (11) The Herald later reported - 
The week after next, children visiting St. Kilda beach will be able to hire donkeys and ride between Brooke's boathouse and the pavilion tea rooms. This innovation has been sanctioned by the St. Kilda Shore Committee, which has made arrangements with a private proprietor. An offer was also made to provide camels with Oriental trappings, each camel to be led, but the committee would not accept. The beach is too crowded at holiday times it was considered, for camels. The owner of the donkeys intends to seek similar privileges on other beaches, including South Melbourne, Brighton and Sandringham. (12)


Sadly for Mr Joe Gardiner, he was not allowed to provide camel rides on the beach and thus his camels, Mutt and Jeff, had to reside at Coburg.

However,  the hopes of the youngsters for donkey rides were dashed, as The Herald reported -  
Rinderpest in West Australia is responsible for depriving children visiting the St. Kilda foreshore of the rides on donkeys to which they had been looking forward after recent announcements in the press. Mr H. O. Allen, secretary, of the St. Kilda Shore Trust, has been in formed by Mr J. Gardiner, who was given the right to provide the donkeys that he purchased some in Perth, West Australia, but was unable to ship them to Melbourne because of the regulations issued since the outbreak of rinderpest forbidding the transfer of animals likely to carry the disease. (13)

The next reference in the newspapers to donkeys on the beach at St Kilda was in December 1931,  when The Sun News-Pictorial published the following photographs -


Donkeys on the beach at St Kilda.
The Sun News-Pictorial, December 19, 1931 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/276261897

Four years later, The Herald in November 1935 published this cute photograph of a girl having a donkey ride at St Kilda


A donkey ride on the St Kilda Beach


In spite of the donkeys looking cute and children being fond of them, again not everyone was happy for them to be on the beach. This was published in the The Sun News-Pictorial  in December 1935 - 
Denies Donkeys Nuisance On St. Kilda Beach - Replying yesterday to a complaint by a correspondent, that donkeys were allowed to be paraded on the beach at St Kilda, to the inconvenience of bathers, the secretary of the St. Kilda Shore Committee (Cr. Dawkins) denied there was any interference with bathers, or any pollution of the beach. The owner of the donkeys, who charged children a penny a ride, paid to take the animals there. This form of amusement, Cr. Dawkins said, was permitted on every popular beach in the world. (14)

Nothing came of the complaint as the donkeys were still providing entertainment  in January 1936 and a year later in January 1937, when this photograph was published in The Argus.


Kiddies enjoying donkey rides  on the beach at St Kilda.

From February to April 1938, the St Kilda Beach donkeys were for sale, advertised as quiet for children. (15)  


The riding donkeys for sale
Was this the end of donkey rides being held on the beach at St Kilda on a regular basis? I can find no further references to them; the War naturally diverted resources from pleasure to patriotic causes and by the time things returned to 'normal' after the War ended, perhaps donkey rides were considered passé or donkey rides were confined to Parks.


Trove list - I have created a list of articles relating to donkeys on the St Kilda beach, access it here.

Footnotes
(1) The Australasian, January 21, 1905, see here.
(2) The Age, March 16, 1904, see here.
(3) Prahran Telegraph, April 2, 1904, see here.
(4) Prahran Chronicle, November 12, 1904, see here.
(5) Prahran Telegraph, December 24, 1904, see here.
(6) The Argus, January 7, 1905, see here.
(7) Prahran Telegraph, November 18, 1905, see here.
(8) The Argus, November 11, 1868, see here; The Age, January 15, 1870, see here.
(9) The Herald, February 21, 1870, see here.
(10) The Argus, January 10, 1871, see here
(11) Prahran Telegraph, December 14, 1923,  see here.
(12) The Herald, December 6, 1923, see here.
(13) The Herald, January 7, 1924, see here.
(14) Sun News-Pictorial, December 4, 1935 see here.
(15) The Herald, March 3, 1938,  see here

Saturday, April 20, 2024

Sister Hollins and Sister Lewis and the Pakenham Infant Welfare Centre

In 2012 a  new Childrens Centre opened in Pakenham, called the Hollins Children Centre.  It has two kindergarten rooms, a toy Library, a meeting room and rooms for the Infant Health nurse.  When Councils and developers are looking for appropriate names for new buildings, parks, streets or other infrastructure, they sometimes contact Local History Societies or me, when I was the  Local History Librarian at Casey Cardinia Libraries, for ideas. At times, they decide that the  name we suggest is a suitable name and this was the case with the Hollins Children Centre. I was reading through the Souvenir Booklet from the Back to Pakenham celebrations held in March 1951 which has the history of various institutions in Pakenham, including the Infant Welfare Centre. The article mentioned that Sister Hollins and Sister Lewis were the first nurses involved with infant welfare in the area, so I suggested  that the new Centre could honour the nurses and in the end it was decided to call  the centre after Sister Hollins. I was very excited and thrilled that the Cardinia Shire Council selected one of 'my names' and I attended the official opening on November 20, 2012.

I first wrote this post in December 2012, for my work blog, Casey Cardinia Links to our Past, and this is an updated and expanded version of my original post.

This is the information from the Souvenir Booklet -
Infant Welfare Centre
Infant welfare work was unknown in the Pakenham district till Sister Hollins(who was in charge of the Pakenham Bush Nursing Hospital) took upon herself the task of trying to get mothers interested in this work. Using one of the single bed wards in the hospital, Sister Hollins started her task in 1934 by persuading mothers as they left the hospital after their babies were born to come back regularly to have their infants weighed and measured and to ask for any advice they might need. Although this was not an easy job, trying to persuade the mothers to come (their mothers managed without health centres, etc), they soon realised what a help the Health Centre was to them, as they could follow their babies' progress week by week. This necessitated moving out of the hospital to a separate room, which was made available adjoining the nurses' sleeping quarters. This room was officially opened at the end of 1935 by Dr. Scantlebury-Brown, accompanied by Sister Muriel Peck. Sister Lewis was then officially appointed Infant Welfare sister for the district, which later extended through the Berwick Shire. In these days there was no modern equipment, and apart from the scales (which were owned by Sister Lewis) the rest of the very limited equipment was made and got together by both Sisters Hollins and Lewis. Sister Lewis carried on in her cramped quarters till she thought the mothers should have a more up-to-date centre in which to have their babies attended to. So at a public meeting convened by Sister Lewis on May 11, 1945, a committee was formed for the object of raising money to build this so badly needed modern centre. So much interest was shown that by February, 1949, this building in the main street was ready to be used. It was officially opened in March, 1949, by Dr Barbara Meredith, Director of Infant Welfare and Maternal Hygiene. It is a pleasure to visit the centre each week with its modern equipment and heating arrangements, and we have much to thank Sister Hollins and Sister Lewis for, for their tireless work and the interest they created throughout this district in infant welfare work
. (1)

The only information I had initially on Sister Hollins and Sister Lewis were their surnames but I found out their full names from the Electoral Rolls (2) -   Lillian Ada Hollins was in 1936 Electoral rolls at the Pakenham Bush Nursing Hospital and Muriel Mary Lewis in the 1937 Electoral rolls also at the Hospital. We'll look at the life of Sister Lewis and then Sister Hollins. 


Pakenham Bush Nursing Hospital. The Hospital officially opened February 11, 1928.
Image: courtesy of David Bourke


Sister Muriel May Lewis
Muriel May Lewis was born in 1901 in North Carlton, to Thomas and Hannah Eliza (nee Dinning) Lewis; a sister Beatrice Isabella was born in Beechworth in 1904. (3)

We can get a sense of Muriel's early life from her father's obituary, who died in October 1928 -
Mr Thomas Lewis - It is with genuine regret that we have to record the death, at his residence, Camberwell, on Wednesday night, of Mr. Thomas Lewis, retired inspector of police, at the age of 60½  years. The deceased, who left the force about six months since, had been in good health till about a month ago, when he contracted a cold which developed into pneumonia, and though carefully nursed, he eventually succumbed to the attack. Very few members of the Victorian police had as fine a record as Mr. Lewis has, though he did not unduly harass the public, he succeeded in maintaining law and order wherever stationed, gaining the appreciation of the public and the warm commendation of his superiors. It is some 15 years since he was attached to the force at Beechworth, subsequently removing to Benalla where he was occupied by clerical duties in the Superintendent's office. Promotion to the rank of sergeant was followed by duty at Kerang, whence he was transferred to Ascot Vale where, after two years, he passed on to Russell Street, ranking as inspector. Here he was, as in his previous positions, highly respected. Reaching the age of 60 in the early part of this year, he retired, and having made a comfortable home, earned a well deserved rest. Sympathy from all who knew Mr. Lewis goes out to his wife and two daughters. On Friday his remains were laid to rest in the Wangaratta cemetery beside those of his parents. (4)

Muriel Lewis first appeared in the Electoral rolls in 1922 and 1924 when she was a trainee nurse at the Royal Children's Hospital and she successfully passed the  Royal Victorian Trained Nurses' Association’s examination in May 1924.


Muriel Lewis - one of the successful candidates.
Ballarat Star, June 24, 1924  http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article214259835 

In the 1925 and 1927 Electoral Rolls, after she was qualified, she was living at 37 St Leonards Avenue, Ascot Vale with her parents. The 1931 rolls show Muriel and Hannah living at 99 Highfield Road, Camberwell. I believe it was in 1934 that Muriel began employment at the Pakenham Bush Nursing Hospital where she was also the Infant Welfare Sister for the Pakenham District. (5)  In March 1945 she was appointed the full-time Baby Health Sister for the entire Berwick Shire, a position which she held until around October 1948 when Muriel became the Matron of the Koo Wee Rup Memorial Hospital. (6) However it appears that Infant Welfare work was her true calling and in May 1951, she returned to the Shire of Berwick as the Infant Welfare Centre Sister. (7)


Sister Lewis returns to Infant Welfare work


Some statistics provided by Sister Lewis in 1952.
Dandenong Journal, January 23, 1952 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article222356832

Sister Muriel Lewis on the left with the women of the Berwick Infant Welfare Committee.

I believe Sister Lewis held that position at the Berwick Shire until late 1954. In the 1954 and 1963 Electoral Rolls, Muriel was back at 99 Highfield Road with Hannah, and in 1968 in 33 Abercrombie Street, Deepdene, which is where she was living when she passed away on March 23, 1970. She is buried at Springvale Cemetery. Hannah passed away in 1963, aged 91 (8). 


Death notice of Sister Lewis
The Age, March 24, 1970 page 23 from newspapers.com


Sister Lillian Ada Clarissa Hollins
Lillian Ada Clarissa Hollins was born in 1899, in Bath, England to Percival and Ada (nee Hounsell) Weare. She was married on March 15, 1919 in Bath to Australian soldier, Lieutenant Roy Digby Hollins, who was about 28 at the time. The couple arrived in Australia in December 1919 and lived in Williamstown, then Dalyston and in March 1921 he took up a block of land at Red Cliffs. Lillian lived with Roy on occasions and in 1926/1927 returned to England for ten months to visit her father. On her return she lived with Roy for some months, then moved to Mildura to work at a private hospital. Lilian wrote to Roy in April 1928 saying she would not be returning to Red Cliffs and she moved to Melbourne to train as a nurse at the Alfred Hospital. We know all this because in October 1930 Roy filed for a divorce on the grounds of her desertion, and the information formed part of his affidavit.  He also noted in his affidavit that the cause of the trouble between the respondent and myself was that the respondent was addicted to unnatural sexual practices with other women, of which she knew I was aware. Shortly before the respondent left me I spoke to her about this matter. At such conversation the respondent evinced no inclination to desist from such practices and indicated a determination to leave me. The divorce was finalised on June 3, 1931.(9)

Interesting case - I feel for Roy that his marriage did not turn out to be 'happy ever after' on the other hand, I can see that a farm at Red Cliffs could have been very isolating and stultifying for Lillian, whether or not she was addicted to unnatural sexual practices with other women. Roy married Daisy Brownlaw in 1931 and he died in 1964. (10)  1931 was also the year that Lillian became a qualified nurse, by passing the Royal Victorian Trained Nurses' Association’s examination.


Lilian Hollins - one of the successful candidates.

In the 1934 Electoral Rolls, Lillian is listed at Dunolly, employed at the District Hospital.  She started at the Bush Nursing Hospital  at Pakenham in November 1934. (11)

In July 1937, the President of the Pakenham Bush Nursing Hospital, Mr J.J. Ahern, who was also the Berwick Shire Secretary, announced that -
It was pleasing also that they might grant a small bonus each to Sister L. Hollins and Sister M. Lewis, of £5, and that was done in graceful recognition of their special services granted freely at all times. (12)

In May 1938 the Sisters took leave of absence and went to England -
Sister Hollins and Sister Lewis,  who have been on the staff of the Pakenham and District Hospital for the past three years, will shortly sail for England, where they intend to stay for 12 months. At a social held in their honor at the Mechanics' Hall on Thursday night, Messrs. R. Giles, H. Dineen and C. Smith supplied excellent music for dancing, and vocal Items were contributed by Mesdames Keable and Hobson, and Mr. H. Gee. (13)

Lillian and Muriel returned to the Hospital after their overseas trip and in January, 1942 it was reported that - 
Secretary of the Pakenham B. N. Hospital for several years past, Sister L. A. Hollins has resigned that position, and Mr S. Banbrook has been appointed in her stead. Appreciative references were made by the committee to her excellent administrative work. (14)

Perhaps it was at a Hospital meeting that Lillian and Sydney fell in love, because on  September 20, 1944 Lillian, then aged 44, married 40-year old Sydney Clifford Banbrook at the Presbyterian Church in Pakenham. On their marriage certificate, Lillian's address was Princes Highway, Pakenham East - the location of the Hospital and Sydney's was Darwin, where he was employed in the Department of Works and Housing. (15)

The Pakenham Gazette of September 29, 1944 reported on the event -
Wedding Bells - Banbrook - Hollins
At Pakenham Presbyterian Church on Wednesday of last week, in the presence of a large number of relatives and friends, Sister Lillian Ada Hollins, matron of Pakenham and District Bush Nursing Hospital, was united in marriage to Mr Sydney C. Banbrook, formerly of Berwick Shire engineer's office staff.
The Church had been beautifully decorated for the occasion by friends of the bride. Spring blossom, Iceland poppies, daffodils, etc., were effectively used in the decorative scheme.
The ceremony was performed by Rev. C. Jones, of Berwick. Mrs H.L. Keys presided at the organ.
The bride, who was given away by an old friend, Mr W. Smellie, looked charming in a frock of Air Force blue, on which was pinned a shoulder spray of blue poppies and fern. She wore a navy blue hat and navy accessories.
The bridesmaid, Sister M. Lewis, wore a blue ensemble, on which was pinned a shoulder spray of pink carnations. Her hat and accessories were grey.
Mr. H.L. Keys acted as best man.
Following the ceremony a number of guests was entertained at the wedding breakfast at Central Hotel, Beaconsfield, at which the usual felicitous toasts were honored.
After the breakfast the happy couple left by for Lakes Entrance, where the honeymoon is being spent.
The bride travelled in an olive green suit, with brown accessories.
Mr. and Mrs. Banbrook will be guest of honour at a social to be held in Pakenham Mechanics' Hall next Wednesday. (16)

The report of the social held for Lillian and Sydney was in the Pakenham Gazette of October 13, 1944. It's worth publishing in full as it praises Lillian and Muriel and shows the high regard the women were held in.
Presentation to Mr. and Mrs S. Banbrook
There was a  large and representative gathering at Pakenham Mechanics' Hall on Wednesday of last week, when  a social evening was tendered to Mr and Mrs S. Banbrook.
The programme for the evening comprised principally dancing. Much appreciated items contributed by Messrs C. Blair and E. Kennedy.
Introduced by Mr P.B. Ronald, Mrs P.F. Thwaites paid a high tribute to the work done by Sister Hollins (now Mrs Banbrook) for Pakenham Hospital. She was always ready to help the Hospital in every way. Not only was she a most capable nurse, but she was also a very good business woman. The good position of the Hospital was very largely due to her efforts. Mrs Thwaites extended to Mr and Mrs Banbrook best wished for a happy and prosperous life together.
Cr T.F. Houlihan said this was a very happy occasion - this social in honour of the newly married couple. He was sure he voiced the sentiments of the whole district in wishing them all the best. All remembered when Sisters Hollins and Lewis came to the district and the marvellous work they had done for the Hospital. There was not one patient who had been there but would, if sick again, so there instead of to a metropolitan hospital. It was a pleasure to visit there. Cr Houlihan assured Mr and Mrs Banbrook that they had the best wishes of district people for their future.
Mr J.J. Ahern, president of the Hospital Committee, said he considered it a privilege to make a presentation to Mr and Mrs Banbrook. He had been closely associated with the Hospital since its inception and recognised the outstanding service that Sisters Hollins and Lewis had given - just as all present that night recognised it, as shown by their attendance and their subscriptions towards the presentation. Ten years ago, when Sisters Hollins and Lewis came here the Hospital was in anything but  a good position. To-day it was one of the best managed  and equipped  Bush Nursing Hospitals in the State - due chiefly to the Sisters. As Sister in Charge, Sister Hollins had the confidence of the committee and the patients. More than that she had the confidence of her staff, as shown by the fact that Sister Lewis had been with her ever since she had been in charge of the Hospital and also in all those years there had been few changes in the domestic staff. Mr Banbrook, soon after he had joined the Shire Office staff,  was entrusted with very important work, which he had done particularly well. Presenting Mr and Mrs Banbrook with a wallet containing £44, Mr Ahern expressed the hope that the gift would assist them in making their home at a future date and that they would purchase something that would remind them of their stay in Pakenham. He extended best wishes to them.
In responding Mr Banbrook said he greatly appreciated their references to one who had for a long time done a wonderfully good job here.  He thanked all for their generous gift and nice remarks.
Mrs Banbrook also suitably responded. (17).

After their marriage, Sydney returned to Darwin; but in March 1945 Lillian took up the role as the Sister in Charge of the Baby Health Centres at Tatura and Kyabram for the Shire of Rodney.  Her relationship with the Council turned sour in March 1946 when she asked for an assistant to help deal with some of the administrative tasks involved with the 2000 plus visits by mothers and their babies; in the first year to March 1946, she had 227 babies on her books and by May 1946, 343 babies. (18) The Council refused this and in fact, Cr L. Cross said that the council had enough to do and that a ladies committee formed by the local CWA could help with the work. (19)

In April 1946, the Council decided to charge her £1 per week rent for the two rooms she lived in at the Tatura Infant Welfare Centre, which she refused to pay. In May that year Sister Banbrook wrote to the Council -
 “I wish to point out (1) that under Section 1 of the Registered Infant Welfare Nurses’ award any nurse required to live in shall be provided with laundry free of charge, but a sum of 20/ per week may be deducted from the wages for board and lodgings. (2) I have done all cleaning since the beginning of the centre, and am still doing so, not forgetting doing the floors, staining and polishing prior to getting linoleum, and painting two-thirds of the building. (3) Mothers ring me at all hours and week-ends, plus a great deal of night writing, for which I could claim time and a half wages." (20)

Not surprising  perhaps, Sister Banbrook resigned at the end of July 1946, the official reason was that  she was joining her husband in Darwin.  Why did she not  move to Darwin straight after her wedding? Possibly there was a shortage of accommodation suitable for married couples after the War or possibly Sydney had been posted  in some remote areas of the Northern Territory and there was no accommodation for spouses or family members.


Sister Banbrook resigns from the Shire of Rodney
Kyabram Free Press, August 2 1946 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/270194812


Sydney died in Adelaide on October 27, 1963 and Lillian on July 30, 1965. They are buried at the North Brighton Cemetery in Adelaide. (21). As a matter of interest, even though Sydney was born in 1904 in Sydney, New South Wales, his parents Alfred Banbrook and Matilda Usher had married in Victoria in 1890 and they had three children in Victoria.  There was a short obituary for Matilda in the Dandenong Journal in January 1951 - 
We regret to learn of the death of Mrs. Matilda Banbrook, of 23 Orwell St., Potts Point, Sydney, but
formerly of Spring Vale and Dandenong. The end came at her home last Wednesday at the age of 83. Deceased was the wife of the late Alfred Banbrook, who pre-deceased her about eight years ago, and was the daughter of the late Silas and Lucy Usher, nee Jewis. She was born at Spring Vale and her remains were interred there last Monday. Rev. W. J. Clarke conducted the service and W. J. Garnar and Son carried out the funeral arrangements.
(22)

Acknowledgement - The book Somebody’s baby: a history of the Pakenham and District Hospital 1926-1992 by Heather Shallard (Pakenham & District Hospital, 1992) provided useful information for this post. 

Footnotes
(1)  Souvenir Booklet: Back to Pakenham March 3-10, 1951. Published by the Back to Pakenham Committee.
(2) Electoral Rolls on Ancestry.com
(3) Indexes to the Victorian Births, Deaths and Marriages.
(4) Ovens and Murray Advertiser, October 20, 1928, see here.
(5) 1934, that was the date Sister Hollins started and various reports say her and Sister Lewis started the same year. Souvenir Booklet report, as transcribed.
(6) Dandenong Journal, March 21, 1945, see here;  Dandenong Journal, May 9 1951, see here.    
(7) Dandenong Journal, May 9 1951, see here
(8)  Retirement date - just a guess from the address in the Electoral rolls.
(9) Information in this paragraph is taken from Lillian Hollin's wedding certificate (to Sydney Banbrook) and the Hollins/Hollins  file from the Divorce Case Files, 1860-1940. VPRS 283 (Supreme Court of Victoria Divorce Files) available on Ancestry.com
(10) Indexes to the Victorian Births, Deaths and Marriages.
(11) Shallard,  p. 30 (see Acknowledgement for citation).
(12) Dandenong Journal, July 22, 1937, see here.
(13) Dandenong Journal, May 11, 1938, see here.
(14) Dandenong Journal, January 21, 1942, see here.
(15) Hollins/Banbrook wedding certificate; From - The Commonwealth of Australia Gazette of June 17, 1948 - the appointment of Sydney Clifford Banbrook as Engineer, Grade 2 (£522-£558), Third Division, Engineering Division, Northern Territory, be confirmed as on and from 17th October, 1947 (see here); 1949 Electoral Roll lists Stanley as a Surveyor at the Department of Works and Housing. 
(16) Pakenham Gazette, September 29, 1944, p. 1.
(17) Pakenham Gazette, October 13, 1944, p. 5.
(18) Kyabram Free Press, March 9, 1945,  see here;  See articles in my Trove list on Sister Banbrook's time with the Shire of Rodney, here.
(19) Shepparton Advertiser, May 28, 1946, see here.
(20)  Kyabram Free Press, May 31, 1946, see here.
(21)  SA Genealogy https://www.genealogysa.org.au/ ; Find a Grave https://www.findagrave.com/
(22) Dandenong Journal, January 24, 1951, see here.

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

The Corner House Drapery and the Ordish Timber Yard, Dandenong East

This postcard of Dandenong 'East' shows The Corner House, on the corner of Walker and Langhorne Streets in Dandenong and the premises of E. Ordish, Timber Merchant, in Langhorne Street.  The photograph was taken around 1909. I am not sure of the boundaries of Dandenong East however State School No. 1403 Dandenong was known as Dandenong East from around the 1930s to the 1950s. The school is located on the corner of Foster and New Street. (1)


Postcard of Dandenong 'East' corner of Walker and Langhorne Streets.

The Corner House was a drapery, previously known as The Red House. The Red House, owned by George Dobson, was sold around March 1905 to Joseph Watts, who then held a Startling Clearing Sale. (2)


Startling Clearing Sale at The Red House.
South Bourke & Mornington Journal, March 29, 1905 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article66142986

The following advertisements tell the story of  The Corner House. In May 1905, The Red House was renamed The Corner House and it advertised on a regular basis in the South Bourke & Mornington Journal.  Around March 1910, Joseph Watts sold his stock to Wilson brothers, the Big Cash Drapers, of Lonsdale Street, Dandenong. 



The Red House becomes The Corner House.
South Bourke & Mornington Journal May 17, 1905 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/66143213 


Advertisement for The Corner House
South Bourke & Mornington Journal, October 7, 1908 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article66148406 


Wilson Brothers acquire the stock of The Corner House.
South Bourke & Mornington Journal,  March 2, 1910 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/66201406 



Wilson Brothers advertisement
South Bourke & Mornington Journal, March 24 1909  http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article66199784 


Who was Joseph Watts?  Joseph Eacott Watts was born in Bristol in England to Joseph and Martha (nee Eacott) Watts.  On July 30, 1873 he married Elizabeth Gittus and they had three children - Elizabeth (1874, died aged 1 month), William Henry (1875, died in Perth in 1937) and Frank Cecil (1877, served in World War One, returned to Australia in 1919 and I have no further information.) Elizabeth's father, Thomas Gittus, was a Councillor at the City of South Melbourne and Mayor in 1893/94. Sadly Elizabeth died, aged only 28, on June 7, 1882 at their home, Clifton Villa, Palmerston Crescent, Albert Park. She was buried in the St Kilda Cemetery, and her parents, Susan and Thomas, were later buried with her. (3).

Less than six months later, the 32 year old James married 22 year old  Elizabeth Charlotte Richardson on November 6, 1882 at the Presbyterian manse in East Melbourne.  She was born in Birmingham, in England, the daughter of William and Mary Anne (nee Newport) Richardson. James and his new wife, Elizabeth had six children - Ida Beatrice (1883, known as Queenie, married Robert Ernest Crooke in 1909 and died 1949), Netta May (1885-1974), Rupert Carlisle (1889-1967), Eric Clarence (1892-1966), Vera Eacott (1896-1989) and Jean Elizabeth (1902, married Frederick Middleton in 1926, died in Adelaide in 1983). (4)

Joseph and Elizabeth were listed in the Electoral Rolls from 1905 until 1934 at 20 Elphin Grove, Hawthorn, except for the 1909 roll where their address was Dandenong, which fits in with the time frame of Watts owning The Corner House drapery. Joseph died January 30, 1937 aged 86 and Elizabeth on November 10, 1952 aged 92 years old. Joseph and Elizabeth are buried at the Booroondara Cemetery, with their daughters Netta and Vera. (5)

 The other business in the photograph was the timber yard of E. Ordish. The first reference I can find of Ordish being in Langhorne Street was from the start of October 1908 when Joseph Watts began advertising The Corner House as being next to Ordish's Timber Yard 
 

The Corner House - next to Ordish's Timber Yard.
South Bourke & Mornington Journal, November 11, 1908 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article66148572 

The first advertisement for the timber yard in the South Bourke and Mornington Journal was October 21, 1908, where Mr Ordish wishes to notify the public of Dandenong and district that he has opened large and commodious yards. A year later the firm became known as E.& J. Ordish. The brothers, Edgar and John, continued at the yard until at least 1912, but in 1913 J.W. Ordish was advertising as the oldest established Builder and Timber Merchant in and Dandenong. Plans arranged for Schools, Halls, Shops, Villas and all styles Farm Buildings. (6).


The opening of the large and commodious yards
South Bourke & Mornington Journal, October 21 1908 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/66148472



J. Ordish joins the business.
South Bourke & Mornington Journal, October 6, 1909 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article66200820


By 1915 A.C. W. Bailey had taken over the yard.
South Bourke & Mornington Journal, October 21, 1915 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article66188662


Edgar and John Ordish were brothers, the sons of Thomas and Mary Jane (nee Ward) Ordish. They were both born Dandenong - John Whiting Ordish in 1866 and Edgar in 1870. Edgar was a builder/contractor and John's occupation in the Electoral roll was listed as a labourer and later a timber merchant. (7).

John married Easter Louisa Blackmore in 1889. They had three children - Hazel (1890, married Albert Crump in 1913, and died 1973), Myrtle (1892, married Geoffrey Collins in 1940 and died 1949 ) and Frank (1895-1897). On January 15, 1915 John enlisted in the A.I.F. He said he was 44 years old, in reality he was nearly 50. John served in the Middle East but was sent home after a time in hospital due to an internal derangement of knee and discharged in July 1916. John died on August 26, 1922 at his home in Beena Avenue, Murrumbeena, aged 55. Easter died On June 12, 1946, aged 87. (8)



Easter Ordish's obituary.
Dandenong Journal, June 12, 1946 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article214794040

Edgar married Jemima Lillian Anderson in 1901. They had the one son, John 'Jack' in 1904. Edgar died on May 10, 1936 at his home 42 Scott Street, Dandenong. Jemima died on July 2,  1942, aged 71. Jack married Myra Vizard in the Dandenong Methodist Church on November 23, 1935. (9)


Edgar Ordish's obituary
Dandenong Journal, May 14, 1936 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article214739599 


Given the opening of Edgar Ordish's timber yard in Langhorne Street was in October 1908  and the sale of Joseph Watt's The Corner House business was  in March 1910, I believe we can safely date the photograph on this postcard to 1909 or a few months either side. 

There is one more element of the postcard - the sender and the addressee. The sender was possibly a Jane, I can't really decipher it. It was sent to Miss Lizzie Hawking, Kogan, Queensland. Kogan is a town west of Dalby and south of Chinchilla. I currently have no other information about Lizzie. 


The back of the postcard


Footnotes
(1) References to Dandenong East School - Dandenong Journal, December 25, 1930, see here; Dandenong Journal, May 21 1941, see here; Dandenong Journal, January 9, 1952, see here.
(2) South Bourke & Mornington Journal, September 14, 1904, see here.
(3) Watts/Richardson wedding certificate; Watts/Gittus marriage The Argus, August 12, 1873, see here; Indexes to Victorian and West Australian Births, Deaths and Marriages; First Australian Imperial Force Personnel Dossiers, 1914-1920 -  National Archives of Australia; Daley, Charles The History of South Melbourne (Robertson & Mullens, 1940); Elizabeth's death notice The Age June 8, 1882, see here and funeral notice The Argus, June 8, 1882, see here; St Kilda Cemetery records on Ancestry.com.
(4) Watts/Richardson wedding certificate; Indexes to Victorian and South Australian Births, Deaths and Marriages.
(5) Electoral Rolls on Ancestry.com; Joseph death notice The Argus, February 1, 1937, see here; Elizabth death notice The Argus, November 11, 1952, see here; Booroondara Cemetery   https://boroondaracemetery.com.au/
(6) Advertisements in South Bourke & Mornington Journal on Trove; J.W. Ordish advertisement South Bourke & Mornington Journal, April 3 1913, see here.
(7) Indexes to Victorian Births, Deaths and Marriages; Electoral Rolls on Ancestry.com.
(8)  Indexes to Victorian Births, Deaths and Marriages; First Australian Imperial Force Personnel Dossiers, 1914-1920 -  National Archives of Australia; John death notice The Argus, August 29, 1922,  see here ; Easter's obituary Dandenong Journal, June 12, 1946, see here
(9) Indexes to Victorian Births, Deaths and Marriages; Edgar death notice  The Argus, May 11 1936, see here; Jemima obituary Dandenong Journal, July 8 1942, see here. Ordish/Vizard wedding Dandenong Journal, December 5, 1935, see here.

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

Miss Beatrice Thomas - Berwick Shire Secretary

The Dandenong Journal reported on January 23, 1952 (1) that Miss Beatrice (Trixie) Thomas had been appointed as the Berwick Shire Secretary. Miss Thomas had been employed by the Shire for 27 years and had been acting as the Assistant Secretary for 'some time.'  She was the daughter of Albert Thomas, who founded  the Berwick Shire News, later the Pakenham Gazette in 1909 and the sister of Herb Thomas, who took over the paper from his father. As a matter of interest, Beatrice Evelyn Victoria Thomas was born on January 22, 1901, the same day Queen Victoria died, so not surprising she has Victoria in her name. She died on February 10, 1997. (2)

Miss Thomas followed Mr K. A. McKay in the role, who had served  for four years and resigned in December 1951. Keith McKay had taken over from the long serving James Joseph Ahern who was in the role from 1906 until he retired December 1947. (3)


Miss Thomas' appointment.
Dandenong Journal January 23 1952  http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article222356811

Clearly, Miss Thomas was well qualified for the position,  however the Returned Soldiers League (RSL) and the Pakenham Upper Progress Association protested against the appointment as the newspaper article from the Dandenong Journal of  February 27, 1952 reported (see below). I have transcribed the article as it gives the rationale for the appointment of Miss Thomas and the support she had from the Councillors. 


Miss Thomas' appointment challenged
Dandenong Journal, February 27, 1952   http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article222357570


Shire Challenged On Failure To Give Preference To Returned Servicemen. “Appointment of Secretary made in best interests of Ratepayers" it replies.
Challenged from two quarters over its failure to give preference to returned servicemen in its recent appointment of a new Shire Secretary, Berwick Shire Council last week replied that the appointment had been made in the best interests of returned soldiers. Chief defendant of council’s action was Cr. C. Greaves, himself a returned man, who said he was very happy over the appointment, but he did compliment the two organisations who had raised the matter, because it showed their vigilance - and vigilance was necessary if preference was to be preserved.

Emphatic Protest - Pakenham Upper Progress Association forwarded an emphatic protest against the departure from the principle of preference to ex-servicemen in the appointment of Shire Secretary.

R.S.L. asks for reasons - Pakenham Branch R.S.L. asked that council inform them of its reasons for departure from the established policy of extending preference to returned service men in the recent appointment. Members of the branch desired to know how many returned service men made application for the position, and, if any, what were their qualifications and experience in municipal administration.

Cr. Kinsella said that both organisations were entitled to a courteous reply. He thought they should be informed that council had been out to obtain the best service it could for the rate payers - and preference was always qualified by “other qualifications being equal.”

“Both bodies are entitled to a full explanation”. Cr. Greaves declared. “Among the returned soldier applicants were none known to us. Had there been a returned soldier applicant in the office with the necessary qualifications he would have got the job. ... I was not prepared to put a stranger into such an important position, especially at this stage. A few years ago this shire was the envy of every shire in the State, but since then we have drifted into financial morass and our present position is causing all of us a lot of concern. Our rates are high and those who are paying rates on broad acres are almost desperate. We had to appoint somebody who was not only capable but willing to economise. Miss Thomas has grown up in the right tradition. She has been 27 years in this office and she knows, as we know, that we have to practice economies. ... I am very happy about her appointment and in congratulating her on getting the position I would also like to congratulate her on the way she has carried out the business of the meeting today. . .I would also like to congratulate the two organisations who have asked this council for an explanation of its action. I think they are entitled to a full explanation. It is now seven years since the last war ended and the further away it recedes the less consideration will be given to returned men. I am afraid a lot regard preference as a penalty against the non - returned soldier. That is quite wrong. It is a just reward to those who suffered physically and mentally on war service. ... It has been remarked at this table today that preference only applies “other things being equal.” I must nail that! That is wrong - there is nothing in the  Act about that. Other things can’t be equal. We have in this council as good a proportion of returned soldiers as in any other council in the State. To be perfectly honest we are not always loyal to our comrades and the principles they stand for. It is necessary that these bodies should be vigilant, as public men are apt to forget and we need constant prodding to remind us of our duty. If Cr. Kinsella moves his motion I will second it.”

Cr. Kinsella said he didn’t want to make a motion of it. His approach, to the appointment had been to gain the best service for the ratepayers of the shire. “Although I sought it, I didn’t have the privilege of carrying arms for my country”, he added, “but my family has been well in it and I claim to have a fair inside knowledge of the feelings of a family that has had active service.

“Despite that, be I right or wrong, service to our rate payers and the efficient handling of their business is my main concern. You all know what my attitude was four years ago, and the past four years have justified my attitude then. If there had been anybody among the Returned Servicemen applicants who measured up to what I know this jobs takes, I would have considered them, but I think we did the right thing.” 

“I feel very strongly on this”, put in Cr. T. Houlihan. “Preference to returned soldiers is something I’ve come up against ever since I returned from the First World War. I found on more than one occasion that preference was always given when it was pick and shovel work, but not when there were administrative posts to be filled. I know in my case, and in others that preference hasn’t been given to returned soldiers when all other things have been equal. The League is doing nothing more than it should do in asking for an explanation. 

"I've listened to this issue for the last 30 years”, declared Cr. C. Harris, another returned man.. . . “I've fought for it for years, but in this case I seconded Cr. Kinsella's motion for the appointment of Miss Thomas. I still say we did the right thing and I’m sticking to my guns. If  they want a thorough explanation I’ll go along and explain the position fully.”

Cr. Rae : Their main query is that we got away from the minute we put on our books in 1941. Finally council, on the motion of Crs Kinsella and Greaves, resolved. “That though we appreciate the enquiries of both organisations we wish to state that the appointment made was made, in our opinion, in the best interests of ratepayers." (4)

Of the Councillors mentioned in the report, Cr Dan Kinsella had lost his brother in World War One. Bertram Kinsella as Killed in Action on September 25, 1917. His other brother, Norman, had also served. Cr Kinsella's sisters were both nurses - Kathleen did not survive the sinking of the Vyner Brooke in February 1942; Nancie served in the Middle East and then nursed the survivors of the Belsen Concentration camp.  Cr Thomas Francis Houlihan and Cr Claud Alfred Harris also served in the Great War. (5)
 

Dandenong Journal,  March 26 1952, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article222358110

One month later, the R.S.L. requested more information from the Council about the appointment. Once again, the  Dandenong Journal  reported  - this is an abridged version of the report, read the full report here.

Pakenham R.S.L. Persists in Preference Probe 
Feeling that the Berwick Council had not given the information it asked for at its last meeting over 
the appointment of a non-returned service secretary, Pakenham R.S.L. last week repeated its request for this information: “How many returned servicemen applied for the position? What were their qualifications?”, it asked. It is getting the information it sought, but not before several brushes between councillors not over any desire to withhold the information but over the claim of some councillors that they had been in favor of giving the information in the first place, but couldn’t get support. This was challenged.

Cr Houlihan said he felt the R.S.L. was entitled to this information. Their purpose was to watch the interests of the returned servicemen and they couldn’t do this unless they had the information. When the advertisement appeared one clause in it was “Preference to Returned Soldiers.” There were 22 applicants for the position, but no one outside the committee of the council knew whether any returned soldier was included or not. Pakenham R.S.L., had been placed in a very awkward position. They were responsible to the League to see that preference was given to returned soldiers in their district. “They do know” proceeded Cr. Houlihan, "that the secretary who was appointed is not a returned soldier although our advertisement stated that preference would be given to returned soldiers. And while I’m in this council I hope to see that preference is given to returned servicemen, or an opinion voiced in support of that policy. ... I feel that the branch is entitled to this information so that they can take proper action. Cr. Houlihan moved that the information be supplied.

Seconding this motion, Cr. Greaves claimed that he had tried to get a more adequate reply in the first place.

There was some support for Miss Thomas - Cr. Kinsella said - I feel this matter has gone far enough. I came to this council table with one purpose only - and that is to get the best service possible for the ratepayers. I took the action in moving as I did in furtherance of that policy and I was supported by 10 councillors. I have nothing against telling the R.S.L. what it wants to know. Certainly tell them. I would say that ’when the position became vacant we should have appointed Miss Thomas there and then if that was our intention. We can’t appoint a member of the staff unless it is unanimous'. 'I may-be wrong', proceeded Cr. Kinsella, but I believe that for a returned soldier to serve this council he would have to have qualities at least equal with one who has given this council long and loyal service and who has nothing against them. I would always support the appointment of one whom I believe, rightly or wrongly, has served this shire well. ... I do object to councillors now getting up and saying they said things they definitely did not say when this matter first came before council.
(6)

The controversy was still raging a month later when the Dandenong Journal conducted  a 'vox pop' on the issue.


The man in the street was asked their opinion
Dandenong Journal,  April 22 1952 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article23175326

Berwick Shire appointment is job for man, they say
The dispute that has thrown Berwick and Pakenham into two camps - whether Miss Beatrice Thomas should be Shire Secretary was settled at the Berwick Shire Council meeting yesterday. But the result is a closely guarded secret. Cr. A. G. Robinson, Shire President, said 'Miss Thomas's appointment was made with the full approval of council'

Mr. Vernon Clark, Pakenham R. S. L. branch honorary secretary,who wants an ex-serviceman appointed, was not admitted to the meeting. Mr Clark will seek the advice of a Queen's Counsel on whether the Council violated it's agreement to grant preference to returned servicemen.

Shire residents yesterday supported Mr Clark's protest.

Mr. L. C. Futcher, Pakenham shopkeeper, said: 'Rejection of the promises made to returned servicemen is a thing that should be stopped before it spreads to other Councils and other employees'.

Miss Alma Lang of Berwick: 'I have two brothers who went right through the War, so I'll always stick up for servicemen'.

Miss Joyce Berry, cook, at Berwick Hospital: 'How can we expect men to join up for the next War if those who fought in the last one aren't given a fair go'.

Misses Evande Trebilen and Pat Fritzlaff, Berwick dressmakers: 'The Shire Secretary's job is a man's job whether he's a returned soldier or not'.
(7)



Counterblast to the R.S.L.
Dandenong Journal,  May 21, 1952 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article222359127

The Dandenong Journal of May 21, 1952 published another article on the issue, this time reporting on some support Miss Thomas was receiving from a number of high profile women's groups.

Women Rally to Defence of Berwick's Shire Secretary. Counterblast To R.S.L.'s Protest.
The women are not taking the R.S.L’s. protest against the appointment of Miss Beatrice Thomas, as Berwick Shire Secretary in preference to an ex-serviceman, lying down. At Monday’s meeting, no less than five letters were received by council, congratulating it on having appointed Miss Thomas, and urging it to stand its ground.

The National Council of Women wrote: "We desire to express to the President and the members of council our appreciation of your action in not allowing any discrimination on the grounds of sex to 
prevent you from appointing the most suitable applicant for the position".

Dr Janet P. Cooper of Albert Park, wrote: "Having read of your selecting Miss Thomas as Shire Secretary, I am pleased to congratulate you on recognising her service and ability. While fully appreciating and remembering what we all owe to the ex-service people, there are situations when the ratepayers are entitled to the most efficient service".

"The League of Women Voters of Victoria congratulate your Shire Council on having appointed as Shire Secretary, your very experienced officer, Miss Thomas’ wrote the president of that organisation. 'The officers and members hope that, in spite of any protests that may be made you will continue to employ Miss Thomas in that position, and to enjoy her services, which after 25 years experience, must be entirely adequate".

Expressing concern at the press statement made by an R.S.L. representative, 'That we will oppose the appointment of a woman as Shire Secretary", the Women’s Christian Temperance Union of Victoria, wrote: "We feel that the appointment would not have been made unless the council is assured that the best interests of the shire would be served by this officer, and trust that your council will adhere to the decision to make qualifications rather than sex, or other issues the basis of the appointment".

Voicing their congratulations on the appointment the Business Professional Women’s Club of Melbourne stated: 'This club considers that in the interests of the community, appointments should made having regard only for the ability and experience of the candidates, and without discrimination because of sex".
(8)


Berwick Shire Council, 1965, including Miss Thomas.
Image: From Syd Pargeter (second from right, middle row), Casey Cardinia Libraries.

So what happened in the end? Miss Thomas retained her appointment and served the Shire of Berwick until she retired in  January 1966.


The retirement dinner for Miss Thomas.


Miss Thomas, outside the headquarters of  Historical Society, 1980s.
Image: Shire of Pakenham photographer

Miss Thomas was an inaugural member of the Historical Society of the Berwick Shire, formed in 1962 (now called the Berwick Pakenham Historical Society) - this is the original headquarters in John Street, Pakenham, built on land donated in 1965, by Les Futcher, who was one of the locals who opposed Miss Thomas' appointment as Shire Secretary in 1952 (see 'vox pop' article, above). Mr Futcher was also an original member of the Historical Society. (9).

I first wrote this post in July 2017 for my work blog, Casey Cardinia Links to our Past, but as Miss Thomas is in the news again, I thought I would update and republish it here.  There is a new housing estate between Pakenham and Nar Nar Goon and the Cardinia Shire is looking for a name and I suggested it be named after Miss Thomas. Her name has been short-listed and the Pakenham Gazette published the following in their April 10, 2024 edition.


Pakenham Gazette, April 10, 2024, p.4.

To be honest, I think others suggested the name as well, but Corey Everitt, the journalist, gave me the credit! I will let you know what the result is. 

PS - at the Cardinia Shire Council meeting held on on Monday, July 15 2024 it was announced that the new suburb would be called Honora. Honora (nee Ryan) and Michael Carney took up land between Pakenham and Nar Nar Goon in 1869. They had married in 1861 and their children were Ellen (born 1862), Alice (1864), John (1866), Johanna (1868), William (1871), Mary Ann (1873) and Thomas (1879). After Michael died in 1880, aged 55, Honora continued to operate the family farm until her death on November 7, 1912, at her property Alpine View, the age of 77. There are still many descendants of the family in the area.

Footnotes
(1) Dandenong Journal January 23 1952, see here.  
(3) In the Wake of the Pack Tracks:  a history of the Shire of Berwick (Berwick Pakenham Historical Society, 1982)
(4) Dandenong Journal, February 27, 1952, see here.  
(6) Dandenong Journal,  March 26 1952, see here
(7) Dandenong Journal,  April 22 1952, see here.  
(8) Dandenong Journal,  May 21, 1952, see here.  
(9)  In the Wake of the Pack Tracks:  a history of the Shire of Berwick, op. cit and https://bphs.com.au/about-us